Perancangan Permainan Simulasi (Game Simulation) Untuk Menilai Tingkat Kematangan Strategi Teknologi Informasi terhadap Strategi Bisnis Dengan Metode IT Balanced Scorecard dan Maturity Model COBIT 4.1
Abstract
Keselarasan strategi Teknologi Informasi terhadap strategi bisnis sangat dibutuhkan untuk mencapai tujuan bisnis. Pencapaian keselarasan strategi, sebagai suatu proses yang berkelanjutan, membutuhkan dukungan dari Top Management dan fungsi-fungsi lain dalam perusahaan. Penilaian kematangan tingkat keselarasan strategi TI terhadap strategi bisnis akan digunakan sebagai alat ukur untuk menilai tingkat keselarasan strategi TI terhadap strategi bisnis. Nilai tersebut akan digunakan sebagai langkah awal untuk tindakan perbaikan berkelanjutan.
Penggunaan permainan simulasi merupakan gabungan dari dua metode experiential learning, yaitu simulasi (simulation) yang dapat melakukan peniruan dari suatu perilaku atau proses dan permainan (game) yang merupakan aktifitas yang kompetitif. Melaui Experiential Learning pengguna permainan dapat melakukan pembelajaran secara aktif dan memperoleh pengetahuan, pemahaman, dan pandangan baru mengenai suatu hal.
Penilaian kematangan tingkat keselarasan strategi TI terhadap strategi bisnis akan mengacu pada konsep Strategic Alignment Model yang diperkenalkan oleh Henderson dan Venkatraman dan IT-Balanced Scorecard yang dikembangkan Grembergen dan Bruggen. Keduanya memberikan panduan mengenai model-model yang dapat diimplementasikan di perusahaan. Sedangkan penilaian kematangannya berdasarkan kriteria Maturity Model COBIT 4.1 (Control Objective on Information and related Technology)
Kata kunci: Permainan Simulasi, Experiential Learning, Teknologi Informasi, Strategi TI, Strategi Bisnis, Strategic Alignment Model-Henderson & Venkatraman, IT-Balances Scorecard – Grembergen & Bruggen, dan COBIT 4.1 Maturity Model.
Abstract
The alignment of Information Technology strategy with business strategy is important to achieve business objectives. Strategy alignment, as an ongoing process, requires support from Top Management as well as from other functions in the company. The assessment of maturity level on the alignment of Information Technology with business strategy becomes the measuring tool to assess the alignment of Information Technology strategy with business strategy. The score, then, will be used as starting point in accomplishing continuous repair action.
The use of game simulation is a combination of two experiential learning methods, namely simulation that can perform the imitation of a behavior or process and game which is a competitive activity. Through Experiential Learning game users can actively learn and gain new knowledge, insights, and insights about things.
The assessment of maturity level of the aligment of Information Technology with business strategy which applied Strategic Alignment Model concept introduced by Henderson and Venkatraman and IT-Balanced Scorecard by Grembergen and Bruggen. Both have given guidelines about several models that can be implemented at company. Moreover, in order to assess the maturity level, this research uses Maturity Model COBIT 4.1 (Control Objective on Information and related Technology.
Keywords: Information Technology, Game Simulation, Experiential Learning, Information Technology strategy, Business strategy, Strategic Alignment Model-Henderson & Venkatraman, IT-Balanced Scorecard-Grembergen & Bruggen, and COBIT 4.1 Maturity Model.
References
http://www.apics.org
Mayer,Igor S., The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A review, https://scienceimpact.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/The%20Gaming%20of%20Policy%20and%20the%20Politics%20of%20Gaming.pdf (
Duke, Richard D., 2011. Origin and Evaluation of Policy Simulation: A Personal Journey, Simulation Gaming Published Online. http://www.unice.fr/sg/authors/bios/Duke,%201046878110367570.pdf
Salen, Katie, Zimmerman, Eric, 2004. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, MIT Press.
Riis, Jens O., 1995. Simulation Games and Learning in Production Management, Chapman & Hall, United Kingdom.
Ward, John and Peppard, Joe. 2003. Strategic Planning for Information System, Wiley.
Applegate, Lynda M., Austin, Robert D., McFarlan, F.Warren. 2007. “Corporate Information Strategy and Management”, Mc Graw Hill.
Grembergen, Wim Van. 2004. “Strategies for Information Technology Governance”, Idea Group Publishing.
Grembergen, Wim Van & Bruggen, Rik Van. 1998. “Measuring and improving corporate information technology through the Balance Scorecard”.
www.ensino.uevora.pt/tmp/cursos/MOSI/sist_e_tec/
Henderson, J.C., & Venkatraman, N. 1999. ”Strategic Alignment : Leveraging Information Technology From Transforming Organization”, IBM System Journal, Vol 38, No 2 & 3, pp 472-484.
IT Governance Institute. 2003. “Board Briefing on IT Governance 2nd Edition”.
IT Governance Institute. 2007. “COBIT 4.1”.
Kaplan, Robert.S, & Norton, David P. 2006. “Balanced Scorecard : Menerapkan Strategi menjadi Aksi”, Harvard Business School, Massachustts.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih, Prof.Dr. 2007. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan”, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dengan PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Swasono, Hananto Adi. 2008. “Penilaian Kematangan Tingkat Keselarasan Strategi Teknologi Informasi terhadap Strategi Bisnis dengan Metode IT-Balanced Scorecard & COBIT 4.1 Maturity Model Studi Kasus: PT. Astra Otopart, Tbk”, Program Studi Magister Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Indonesia.
Atmani, Agnes Karina Pritha. 2008. “Penilaian Kematangan Tingkat Keselarasan Strategi Teknologi Informasi terhadap Strategi Bisnis dengan Metode IT-Balanced Scorecard & Maturity Model COBIT 4.1 Studi Kasus: Akademi Sekretari/LPK Tarakanita”, Program Studi Magister Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Indonesia.
Tandra, Fenny, “Permainan Simulasi Optimasi Peletakan Container di Kapal dengan Pendekatan Prototype”, Departemen Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia, Ganjil 2007/2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/jags.v3i2.1856
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesAbstrak - 0 times FullText - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Animation & Games Studies
Journal of Animation and Games Studies (JAGS) - ISSN 2460-5662 (print) || 2502-499X (online)