KRIYA KERAMIK: WUJUD, POSISI, DAN PERANNYA DI MASA KINI
Abstract
This article act as a response for what is kriya especially ceramic craft in nowadays context. Public
usually knows about ceramic is limited to traditional terracotta product that they usually found in a
craftsmen village or an industrial mass produce ceramic that they always use in their everyday life.
Kriya (or craft in the western term) now has grew more not only limited in the scope of tradition or
even a mass product only. There are many new small independent studio emerge as a new perception
that combine the potential of both industrial and traditional have. The role of educational institutions
are producing graduates working in the field of ceramic craft has established a new perception on
how it should craft in contemporary ceramics put his position in the midst of globalization. Ultimately
concluded that the ceramic craft began to position himself to a wider sphere, not only as a center for
craftsmen but also intangible and handicraft industries based independent studio-based designermaker.
Keywords : kriya, ceramic, culture, identity
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Gustami, SP. 1992. Filosofi Seni Kriya Tradisional Indonesia, dalam SENI: Jurnal Pengetahuan dan Penciptaan Seni. II/01 – Januari 1992. Yogyakarta: BP ISI.
Joedawinata, A. 2008. Unsur-Unsur Pemandu dalam Artefak Tradisional: Artefak Peralatan Anyaman di Kawasan Cirebon. Jurnal Ilmu Desain. Vol.3[2]. 57-74.
____________ . 2005. “Unsur-unsur Pemandu dan Kontribusinya dalam Perwujudan Sosok Artefak Tradisional dengan Indikasi-indikasi Lokal yang Dikandung dan Dipancarkannya”. PhD Theses. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Krisnanto, Sri, dkk. (eds.). 2009. Seni Kriya dan Kearifan Lokal dalam Lintas Ruang dan Waktu. Yogyakarta: BID ISI.
Lilley, D. 2009. Design For Sustainable Behaviour: Strategies and Perception. Design Studies 30 (2009), 704-720. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001.
Mayall. W.H. 1979. Principles in Design. London: Design Council.
Nugraha, A. 2010. Transforming Tradition for Sustainability Through ‘TCUSM’ Tool. Synnyt Origins: Finnish Studies in Art. no.3, pp. 20 – 36.
Piliang, Y.A. 2011. Dunia yang Dilipat. Bandung: Matahari.
Raharjo, T. 2009. Globalisasi Seni Kerajinan Keramik Kasongan. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana ISI Yogyakarta.
Sumardjo, J. 2006. Estetika Paradoks. Bandung: Sunan Ambu Press.
Sutrisno, Mudji; Hendar Putranto (eds.). 2005. Teori-Teori Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Tonkinwise, C. 2011. A Taste for Practice: Unrepressing Style in Design Thinking. Design Studies 32 (2011) 533-545. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.001.
Zainuddin, I.B. 2006. Desain, Sains Desain, dan Sains tentang Desain. Jurnal Ilmu Desain, Vol.1[1], h 17-33. Bandung: ITB.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/corak.v1i2.2322
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Akbar Adhi Satrio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
ISSN 2301-6027 (print) | ISSN 2685-4708 (online).
View My Stats