Novel Grafis: Studi Awal Tentang Istilah dan Bentuk
Abstract
on the term ‘graphic novel’. As we can see, the term
is problematic. Most arguments shaped around
‘graphic novel’ clearly show that the works have
been regarded as a part of literature, while the
others have been considered the term as a form
of sequential art which has lengthened story. The
aim of this article, then, is to deconstruct the term
‘graphic novel’ by pointing out the weaknesses, both
through the meaning of the term and also by means
of the discourses that have been strengthened with
some episteme built with the essence to justify the
meaning of graphic novel amidst the discourses of
sequential art
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Darmawan, Hikmat. Tahun tidak diketahui. “Novel
Grafis, apaan sih?” http://hikmatdarmawan.
wordpress.com/2010/02/15/novel-grafis-apaansih-bagian-1/
Eagleton, Terry. 2008 (Anniversary Edition).
Literary Theory. An Introduction. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
GoldSmith, Francisca. 2010. The Readers’ Advisory
guide to Graphic Novels. Chicago: American
Library Association
Harvey, Robert C. 1994. The Art of Funnies. An
Aesthetic History Studies in Popular Culture.
Jackson: University Press of Mississippi
Kandinsky, Wassily. 1912. “On the Problem of
Form”. 1912. http://www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/
courses/phil%20of%20art/kandinskytext5.htm
McCloud, Scott. Agustus 2001. Memahami Komik
(Tr S Kinanti). Jakarta: KPG.
Stegall-Armour, Amanda. 2010. “The Only Thing
Graphic is Your Mind. Reconstructing the
Reference Librarian’s View of the Genre”. Dalam
Robert G. Weiner (ed). Graphic Novels and
Comics in Libraries and Archives. Essays on
Readers, Research, History, and Cataloging.
London: McFarland & Company, Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/ars.v1i16.2826
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
visitor visitor