THE FRAGILE MASCULINE: GENDER, SEXUALITY, RACE AND RELIGION AS A COMPLEXITY OF ELISCHA'S CHARACTER IN “LOVE ME HARDER” BY CHICKS* (2020)
Abstract
Performance elements such as stage properties, actors, text, music, lighting, and other elements appear when the performance represents symbols and meanings. This study tries to deconstruct ideas about gender and sex through an exploration of reading the meaning of the elements of the 'Love Me Harder' performance by the theatre group CHICKS*. The performance was held at the LOFFT Leipzig Theater in February 2020. The data collected was from watching the performance booklet and the theatre group's website. As a theoretical framework, this research will use literature studies, for example, theorists Susan Bordo (2000), Judith Butler (1999), Daniel Boyarin (2003), and Ann Stoler (1996). This study presents the discourse on the meaning of the body and the type or form of sex, especially the phallus, as something that carries feminine or masculine traits naturally or culturally. From the analysis, it can also be explained that the show tries to dismantle the stereotypes attached to masculine traits and criticizes masculine domination and patriarchy concerning power and colonialism, and discrimination against race and religion.
Keynotes: performance, Love Me Harder, CHIKS*, stereotype
Full Text:
PDF (English)References
Bordo, S. (2000(1. paperback ed.)). The Male Body: A new look at men in public and in private. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. P. 26- 89.
Boyarin, D. (2003). Queer Theory and The Jewish Question. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. P. 17.
Brooks, A. (2017). Genealogies of Emotions, Intimacies, and Desire: Theories of changes in emotional regimes from medieval society to late modernity / Ann Brooks. New York; London: Routledge. P. 72.
Butler, J. (1999(10th-anniversary ed.)). Gender Trouble Feminism and The Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge. P. 70- 141.
Connell, R. (2005(2nd ed.)). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press. P. 78.
Connell, R., Hearn, J., & Kimmel, M. S. (2005). Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. SAGE Publications, Inc. P. 51.
Green, R. (1987). The “Sissy Boy Syndrome” and The Development of Homosexuality. New Haven [i.a.]: Yale Univ. Press. P. 6- 27.
Rae, G. (2020). Questioning the Phallus: Jacques Lacan and Judith Butler. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 21(1). DOI: 10. 1080/15240657.2020.1721113. Pp. 12- 26.
Stoler, A. L. (1996 (2. print. ed.)). Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's history of sexuality and colonial order of things. Durham [i.a.]: Duke Univ. Press. P. 3- 5, 115.
Swartley, W. M. (2003). Homosexuality: Biblical interpretation and moral discernment. Scottdale, Pa.: Herald Press. P. 31.
Turner, W. B. (2000). A Genealogy of Queer Theory. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press. P. 109.
West, R. (2000). Subverting Masculinity: Hegemonic and Alternative Versions of Masculinity in Contemporary Culture. Amsterdam [i.a.]: Rodopi. P. 208.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/tnl.v19i2.7267
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF (English) - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.