Keberadaan Seni Gejog Lesung Mukti Lestari di Desa Pendowoharjo Bantul Yogyakarta
Abstract
Art evolves with the dynamics of society. The reflection of the geographical region through the form of an art is a picture that a form of art can not be separated from the elements of life and nature that surrounds the community. In agrarian society in Krandohan Pendowoharjo Sewon Bantul village, the community is close to an art form that is characterized by agrarian art of Gejog Lesung. Art is well developed in the area because the people still put Gejog Lesung as a form of entertainment performances. Along with the development of a dynamic era, then Gejog Lesung decadence in continuity. On the one hand the generation of mothers who are getting older as main supporters of Gejog Lesung art feel not as energetic as before in his appearance. On the other hand the younger generation are reluctant to learn and engage in art activities Gejog Lesung. Such problems often occur in the existence of a traditional performing arts. Feminism in the show Gejog Lesung with the role of mothers, making the art has its own specifications, given the busyness owned by most of the mothers either as housewives or other workers still take the time to engage in such activities. The degrading view of the potential possessed by a woman can be avoided by seeing the activities of these mothers. Etnomusikologis a form of art can be seen a manifestation in the system contained in a society. Through the art Gejog Lesung can be seen from the pattern of a form of society in appreciating the arts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amabile, T.M., 1983.The Social Psychology of Creativity, New York: Springer-Verlag,
Aschrorof, Bill, gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, 1989. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practise in Post-Colonial Literatures, London and New York.
Bachtiar, Harsja W., 1981. “Kreativitas: Usaha Memelihara Kehidupan Budaya”, dalam majalah Analisis Kebudayaan Tahun I Nomor 2.
Brandon, James., 1967. Theater in Southeast Asia, Massachusetts Harvard
University Press.
Blacking, John., 1973. How Musical is Man?, London: Faber and Faber.
Brown, Radcliff A.R., 1952. Structure and Function in Primitve Society, New
York: The Free Press.
Case, Sue-Ellen., 1988. Feminism and Theatre, London: The Macmillan Press.
Darma, Budi., 1993. “Stagnasi Kritik Sastra”, dalam Jurnal Seni Nomor III/01-Januari.
Fakih, Mansour., 1987. Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial, Pustaka Pelajar.
Forte, Jeanie, 1990 “Woman’s Performances Art: Feminism and Posmoderism” dalam Performing Feminism: Feminist Critical Theory and Theater, Sue-Ellen Case, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kayam, Umar. 1981. Seni, Tradisi, masyarakat, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Koentajaraningrat, 1985. “Persepsi Tentang Kebudayaan Nasional”, dalam
Persepsi Masyarakat Tentang Kebudayaan, Alfian (Ed.) Jakarta: PT. Gramedia,
______________, 1974. Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan, Jakarta: Jambatan.
______________, 1984. Kebudayaan Jawa, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti., 1984. Dasar-dasar Linguistik, Jakarta: Fakultas Sastra Universitas Indonesia.
Malinowski, 1987. “Teori fungsional dan Struktural”, dalam Teori Antropologi I, Jakarta: UI Press.
Raden, Franki., 1994. “Musik, Industrialisasi dan Kapitalisme di Indonesia”,
dalam Laporan Temu Ilmiah MSPI di Flores NTT pada tanggal 1-3 Desember.
Soedarso Sp., 1990. Tinjauan Seni , Yogyakarta: Saku Dayar Sana.
Selo Soemardjan. 1981. “ Kesenian Dalam Perubahan Kebudayaan”, Majalah Analisis Kebudayaan Tahun I Nomor 2 tahun
Van Peursen, 1976. Strategi Kebudayaan, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/selonding.v12i12.2932
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.