Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Antara Individualitas dan Kolektivitas: Studi Hubungan Pemain Gim PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) Mobile
Abstract
Selama ini para ilmuwan sosial berdebat tentang bagaimana tindakan individual dan kolektif pada interaksi manusia. Asumsi yang cenderung dipakai dalam perdebatan tersebut adalah antara individualitas dan kolektivitas sebenarnya tidak berdiri sendiri, sebab keduanya saling mempengaruhi, bahwa suatu tindakan kolektif sesungguhnya dibangun dari individu-individu yang bekerjasama secara kolektif. Asumsi-asumsi ini berangkat dari studi terhadap masyarakat yang memiliki keterikatan struktural dengan intensionalitas interaksi yang tinggi. Lantas bagaimana jika fenomena empiriknya digeser pada masyarakat egaliter yang tidak terikat struktur di dunia virtual? Kajian pada studi-studi tentang interaksi pemain gim daring dan metode etnografi virtual pada dialektika yang terjadi dalam interaksi antara pemain gim Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) Mobile, menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kecenderungan yang dapat mengubah asumsi-asumsi terdahulu mengenai individualitas dan kolektivitas dikarenakan oleh kompleksitas interaksi yang terbangun dalam ruang tersebut.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aaker, J. L., & Williams, P. (1998). Empathy versus pride: The influence of emotional appeals across cultures. Journal of consumer research, 25(3), 241-261.
Bate, S. P. (1997). Whatever happened to organizational anthropology? A review of the field of organizational ethnography and anthropological studies. Human relations, 50(9), 1147-1175.
Baumeister, R. F. (1991). The meanings of life. New York: Guilford.
Baxter, L. A. (2004). A tale of two voices: Relational dialectics theory. Journal of Family Communication, 4(3-4), 181-192.
Bevir, M. (1996). The individual and society. Political Studies, 44(1), 102-114.
Boissevain, J. (1968). The place of non-groups in the social sciences. Man, 3(4), 542-556.
Chakrabarti, A. (1992). Individual and collective pride. American Philosophical Quarterly, 29(1), 35-43.
Cruz, C., Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2017). The need to achieve: Players' perceptions and uses of extrinsic meta-game reward systems for video game consoles. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 516-524.
Franck, T. (2000). The empowered self: Law and society in the age of individualism.
Fritz, K., & Bukiet, B. (2010). Objective Method for Determining the Most Valuable Player in Major League Baseball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 10(2), 152-169.
Gerungan, W. A. (2004). Psikologi sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage publications.
Gluckman, M. (2017). Politics, law and ritual in tribal society. New York: Routledge.
Greenberg, K. E. (1992). Magic Johnson: Champion with a Cause. Minneapolis: Lerner Publications.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Hogg, M. A. (2008). Personality, individuality, and social identity. Personality and social behavior, 177-196.
Hussain, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2009). The attitudes, feelings, and experiences of online gamers: a qualitative analysis. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 747-753.
Janis, I. L., & Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (Vol. 349). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jia, A. L., Shen, S., Bovenkamp, R. V. D., Iosup, A., Kuipers, F., & Epema, D. H. (2015). Socializing by gaming: Revealing social relationships in multiplayer online games. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 10(2), 11.
Jonasson, K., & Thiborg, J. (2010). Electronic sport and its impact on future sport. Sport in society, 13(2), 287-299.
Kershnar, S., & Feit, N. (2001). The most valuable player. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 28(2), 193-206.
Kesselring, T., & Müller, U. (2011). The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3), 327-345.
King, A. (2009). Overcoming structure and agency: Talcott Parsons, Ludwig Wittgenstein and the theory of social action. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9(2), 260-288.
Kusumawardani, S. P. (2015). Game Online Sebagai Pola Perilaku (Studi Deskriptif Tentang Interaksi Sosial Gamers Clash Of Clans Pada Clan Indo Spirit). Jurnal Antropologi FISIP Universitas Airlangga, 4(2), 154-163.
Lee, D. (2000). The society of society: The grand finale of Niklas Luhmann. Sociological Theory, 18(2), 320-330.
Majaro-Majesty, H. O. (2012). Sports, emotional security, integration and peace: a cue from the non-participation of Nigerian national football teams at mundials. An occasional paper presented at the department of sociological studies, Tai Solarin University of Education, Nigeria.
Nassehi, A. (2002). Exclusion individuality or individualization by inclusion?. Soziale Systeme, 8(1), 124-135.
Nazir, M. (1988). Research methods. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Newcomb, T. M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook, 28-51.
Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (Eds.). (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. Sage.
Prayitno, E. (2006). Psikologi perkembangan remaja. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
Prentice, D. A. (2006). Acting like an individual versus feeling like an individual. Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (p. 37-55). Sage Publications, Inc.
Putnam, R. D. (2002). Bowling together. The American Prospect, 13(3), 20-22.
Ramberg, B. T. (2014). Irony’s Commitment: Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. The European Legacy, 19(2), 144-162.
Ritzer, G. (1990). The current status of sociological theory: The new syntheses. Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses, 1-30.
Rudyansjah, T. (2015). Emile Durkheim: Pemikiran Utamanya dan Percabangannya ke Radcliffe-Brown, Fortes, Levi-Straus, Turner, dan Holbraad. Jakarta: Kompas.
Sapach, S. C. (2015). The WoW Factor: A Virtual Ethnographic Study of Sacred Things and Rituals in World of Warcraft. In Radde-Antweiler, K. Methods for Analyzing Let's Plays: Context Analysis for Gaming Videos on YouTube. (p. 40-100) gamevironments, (2).
Sarwono, W. Sarlito, dan Meinarno, A, Eko. (2009). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Sayers, S. (2007). Individual and society in Marx and Hegel: Beyond the communitarian critique of liberalism. Science & Society, 71(1), 84-102.
Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. Social identity: Context, commitment, content, 3(1), 6-34.
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 20(5), 454-463.
Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., Haslam, S. A., & Veenstra, K. E. (2006). Reconceptualizing personality: Producing individuality by defining the personal self. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (p. 11–36). Sage Publications, Inc.
Walgito, B. (2007). Psikologi kelompok. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Wang, H., & Sun, C. T. (2011). Game reward systems: Gaming experiences and social meanings. In DiGRA Conference (Vol. 114).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/jags.v6i1.3563
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Guntur Cobobi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Animation and Games Studies (JAGS) - ISSN 2460-5662 (print) || 2502-499X (online)