DEKONSTRUKSI BENDA SEHARIHARI DALAM KARYA SENI LUKIS

Anton Budi Setyawan

Abstract


Kebudayaan selain sebagai sebuah tatanan nilai, bahasa, ilmu pengetahuan, religi dan sistem mata pencaharian juga merangkum persoalan mekanisme penggunaan peralatan hidup berupa benda-benda yang dipergunakan dalam keseharian sekelompok masyarakat. Kebudayaan juga bicara soal benda/objek/artefak. Setiap kelompok dan lapisan masyarakat telah memahami bagaimana benda-benda tersebut bergerak pada wilayah fungsi dan simbol. Persoalan narasi dalam benda-benda keseharian akan menjadi menarik bila dijadikan sebagai subject matter penciptaan karya seni rupa. Sebagai sebuah upaya untuk melepaskan diri dari genre seni lukis still life yang melukis objek benda sehari-hari dengan pendekatan estetika formalistik, penulis kemudian memilih mendekonstruksi benda-benda keseharian tersebut dengan tujuan untuk memaknai ulang narasi kebendaan agar kontekstual dengansituasisosialdankulturalsaatini. Culture than as a value system, language, science, religion and livelihood systems also summarizes the problems of life equipment usage mechanism in the form of objects used in everyday life of a people. Culture is also about things/objects/artifacts. Each groups and walks of life have to understand how these objects moving in the area of the function and symbol. The issue of narration in everyday objects will become attractive when used as the subject matter of the creation of works of art. As an effort to break away from the genre of still life paintings, which is painted everyday objects with formalistic aesthetic approach, the authors then chose to deconstruct objects daily with the aim to redefine the narrative material to be contextual with the social and cultural situation today.

Keywords


budaya benda, still life, narasi, dekonstruksi; cultural objects, still life, narrative, deconstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Langmuir, Erika. 2010. A Closer Look: Still Life. National Gallery Company, Yale:

University Press, London.

Liberman, Alexander. 1956. Atelier of Pablo Picasso, Vogue.

Lun Wu. 2014. Still life: an Investigation of Realism in Oil Painting. RMIT University:

Melbourne.

Karakas, Scott L. 2010. Creative and Critical Thinking in the Arts and Sciences: Some

Examples of Congruence. Forum on Public Policy Journal, Florida Gulf Coast

University.

Simonton, Dean Keith. 2007. “The Creative Process in Picasso's Guernica Sketches:

Monotonic Improvements versus Nonmonotonic Variants”. Creativity Research

Journal.

Wallas, Graham. 1926. The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

White, Kit. 2011. 101 Things to Learn in Art School. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Yusuf Lubis, Ahyar. 2014. Potmodernisme Teori dan Metode. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language.

Cambrigde Dictionary Online.

Merriam Webster Dictionary.

Oxford Dictionary Language Matters www.MOMA.org

www.artforum.org




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/invensi.v2i2.1868

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Anton Budi Setyawan



Editorial Address:

Graduate School of the Indonesia Institute of the Arts Yogyakarta

Jalan Suryodiningratan 8 Yogyakarta 55143, Indonesia

Telp./Fax: 0274 419791

email : jurnal.invensi@isi.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

View my stat Visitors