KLASIFIKASI PRIORITAS KETERTARIKAN PERILAKU PENGUNJUNG PAMERAN TERHADAP KARYA SENI RUPA KONTEMPORER

Dessy Rachma Waryanti

Abstract


Many elements are presented to visitors during an exhibition of contemporary art. These elements include the overaching concept of the exhibit (Ko), issues raised in the exhibition (Is), the name of the artist whose popularity attracts patrons (Na), and visual forms of the art itself (Vi). Using these four elements I compiled questions and interviewed patrons with various backgrounds in the arts. The goal was to find out these patron’s interest priorities; in other words, which aspects of the exhibit were of most interest to them as an observer. Previous literature on visitor behavior and social response at contemporary art exhibitions has been used as a base for this research. This study aims to highlight the different interest priorities as a visitor behaviour and audiens reception due to exhibition. I My respondences in this research is the exhibition visitors who had a background in art, but not necessarily in the discipline being exhibited. The results of this study will serve to determine the interest of art exhibition patrons, so that artists and curators can be made more aware of the gaps that exist between exhibit creation and viewer interest, and how those gaps can be better closed.

Keywords


contemporary art, visitor behaviour, social response, contemporary exhibition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, Laurie Schneider. 1996. The Methodologies of Art. United

Kingdom: Westview Press.

Ali, Amra. 2012. The Gallery as a Meeting of Ideas. Nukta Art: 38-42.

Axelsson, Karl. 2013. “Taste is not to conform to the art, but the art to

the taste”:aesthetic instrumentalism and the British body politic in

neoclassical age. Journal of Aesthetic and Culture.

Banks, Marcus. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. British Library:

Sage Publication Ltd.

Basrowi dan Suwandi. 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological

Theory, vol. 7.

Choy, Lee Wong. 2014. Anecdote and Theme: Reflections on Curating

Contempoary Art from Southeast Asia. Sherman Contemporary

Art Foundation Asia Series.

Dirk vom Lehn; and Heath, Christian. 2005. Accounting for New

technology in Museum Exhibitions. Arts & Humanities:

International Journal of Arts Management.

Dobrez, Patricia. The Case for Hand Stencils and Prints as Proprio

Performative. Arts: Independent Scholar Arts Journal.

Emzir. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Jakarta: Raja

Grafindo Perkasa.

Gladston, Paul. 2014. Interviews and Documentary Sources in Chinese

Contemporary Art Research: Towards the Critical Use of

Polylogues. Art Libraries Journal.

Jackson, Beth. 2013. Down the Rabbit Hole: Reorienting Contemporary

Art Practice. Art Monthly Australia: Curious Summer; 266.

Gay, L. R. & Airasian, Peter. 2000. Educational Research: Competencies

for Analysis and Application. London: Prentice-Hall International

(UK) Ltd.

Given. 2008. Observational Researh. Sage Publication Kothe, Elsa Lenz,

dkk. 2015. Vanishing Ice: Art as a Tool for Documenting Climate

Change. International Research: Art Education.

Leake, Maria D. 2014. Social Engangements With Contemporary Art:

Connecting Theory with Practice. Arts and Humanity Full Text: Art

Education; 73.

_____________. 2012. Art as Social Practice: Exploring the

Contemporary. Arts and Humanity full Text: Art Education; 65.

Loschke, Sandra Karina. 2010. Crafting relations: Aspects of Materiality

and Interactivity ini Exhibition Environments. Arts and Humanities:

Craft + Design Enquiry.

Madan, Amrita and Nitish Jain. 2012. Contemporary Exploration of

Traditional Material Systems Wai, Maharashtra. Journal of Forms,

Techniques, and Experiments. Arts and Humanity: Contemporary

Arts Journal.

Marshall, Laurie. 2014. Art as a Peace Building. Journal of Art Education;

Mc Donald, Helen. 2006. I Feel, Therefore I Think. Arts & Humanities Full

Text: Art Journal.

Miles, Matthew B. & Huberman, A. Michael. 1994. Qualitative Data

Analysis. London: Sage Publication.

O’ Donoghue, Donal. 2015. The Turn to Experience in Contemporary Art:

A potentiality for Thinking Art Education Differently. National art

Education Association, Studies in Art Education: A journal of

Issues and Research.

Overend, David. Clubbing audience: Relational Theatre Practice at ‘Death

Disco’. Cambridge University Press.

Read, Herbert. 1972. The Meaning of Art. New York: Praeger

Paperbacks.

Rentschler, Ruth. 1998. Museum and Performing Arts arketing: A Clite of

Change. Arts and Humanities: Journal of Arts Management.

Rolling Jr, James Haywood. Art as Social Response and Responsibility:

Reframing Critical Thinking in Art Education as a Basis for Alturistic

Intent. Journal of Art Education – March.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/invensi.v1i2.1611

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Dessy Rachma Waryanti



Editorial Address:

Graduate School of the Indonesia Institute of the Arts Yogyakarta

Jalan Suryodiningratan 8 Yogyakarta 55143, Indonesia

Telp./Fax: 0274 419791

email : jurnal.invensi@isi.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

View my stat Visitors