Product Innovation Traditional Pottery Crafts Gorontalo
Abstract
Gorontalo’s traditional pottery crafts had stagnation and were nearly extinct because it is deserted by its users. Presumed it happened because the final products are less innovative. Thus they are unable to fulfill the dynamics of market demand. This study aims to innovate Gorontalo’s traditional pottery products to be able to regain interest in the market. Studies use the method of art creation that is done through several stages: 1) exploration to discover the concept of design creation; 2) Designing to visualize the concept into visual design; 3) realizing of the design into the product prototype; 4) evaluation in order to envision market prospects. Throughout the process of research, six innovative pottery prototypes were made. The innovative value of these prototypes appears to the uniqueness of forms and finishing’s color variation. The distinctiveness of each prototype is reflected on the cultural art image of Gorontalo and forms of endemic animal of Sulawesi, which became the origin of the creation idea. Based on the evaluation, these all prototypes are said to have promising market prospects and worthy of production. Therefore, traditional Gorontalo pottery craftmens are advised to produce such prototypes to fulfill the dynamic demand of the market so that traditional pottery products do not lose consumers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Anggun, S. S. (2019). Produksi Perhiasan Bertemakan Fauna Endemik. Corak: Jurnal Seni Kriya, 7(2), 171–179.
Attah, M. A., Kyei, K. A., & Addae, A. (2019). Production of Ceramic Wares with Idea Development from Shells to Promote Femininity in Ghanaian Pottery. American Journal of Art and Design, 4(2), 8–14.
Botutihe, M., & Daulima, P. (2003). Tata Upacara Adat Gorontalo. Gorontalo: Dinas Pariwisata.
Guntur. (2016). Metode Penelitian Artistik. Surakarta: ISI Press.
Guntur. (2019). Inovasi Pada Morfologi Motif Parang Batik Tradisional Jawa. Panggung: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 29(4), 373–390.
Gustami, S. (2007). Butir-Butir Mutiara Estetika Timur: Ide Dasar Penciptaan Seni Kriya Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Prasista.
Hopper, R. (2013). Functional Pottery: Form and Aesthetic in Pots of Purpose (Second Edi). Ohio: The American Ceramic Society.
Nie. (2012). Gorontalo Memiliki Potensi Kerajinan Gerabah. Gorontalo Post, Selasa 1 Desember 2012, p. 4.
Sandego, J. Y., Ningsih, S., & Ihsan, M. (2014). Karakteristik Biofisik Habitat Tarsius (Tarsius Pumilus) Di Gunung Rorekatimbu Kawasan Taman Nasional Lore Lindu Sulawesi Tengah. Warta Rimba, 2(1), 9–16.
Satrio, A. A. (2012). Kriya Keramik: Wujud, Posisi, dan Perannya Di Masa Kini. Corak: Jurnal Seni Kriya, 1(2), 167–176.
Sudana, I. W., & Dangkua, S. (2011). Potensi dan Permasalahan Kerajinan Keramik Gerabah Di Desa Tenilo Kota Gorontalo. LPPM Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Gorontalo.
Sudana, I. W., & Mohamad, I. (2021). Konsep Pengembangan Seni Kerajinan Eceng Gondok Gorontalo. Panggung: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 31(2), 93–109.
Sudiyti, N. (2021). Tekstur Dalam Estetika Keramik. Corak: Jurnal Seni Kriya, 10(2), 239–246.
Thompson, F., Hannam, K., & Petrie, K. (2012). Producing Ceramic Art Works Through Tourism Research. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 336–360.
Utomo, A. M. (2007). Wawasan & Tinjauan Seni Keramik. Denpasar: Paramita.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/corak.v11i2.7027
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF (Bahasa Indonesia) - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 I Wayan Sudana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
ISSN 2301-6027 (print) | ISSN 2685-4708 (online).
View My Stats